|
The primary objectives of these meetings were to gain a consensus
on a mutual recognition arrangement or agreement (MRA) and to formulate
general rules for the accreditation of international and national
measurement standards and traceability systems.
The APMP has a twenty-two-year history. It has made great progress
in the past few years under the distinguished leadership of the
immediate past chairman Dr. Barry Inglis, the excellent secretary
Dr. Angela Samuel, and the Australian
Secretariat. The new chairman and secretariat from Japan are very
happy to be their successors; however, many issues must be resolved
before we can reach an overall consensus within our economies. We
hope to establish strong contacts within our Asia-Pacific region
through face-to-face discussions and network correspondence with
the member economies. I would like to ask members of the Executive
Committee, chairpersons of the nine Technical Committees, and members
of the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) Advisory Committee to
extend their support and counsel to the new secretariat.
I have been working in the field of mechanical and dimensional
metrology at NRLM and have experience as a member of CIML, APLMF,
APLAC, IMEKO (International Measurement Confederation), ISO/REMCO
(Reference Materials), and some other technical committees of ISO.
I participated in consultative committee meetings such as CCU and
CCQM at the Metre Convention. These experiences taught me that the
most important factor in the field of metrology
|
 |
We had many busy preliminary meetings during the GA and engaged
in many discussions on the concept of Calibration Measurement Capability
(CMC)(CMC) based on the results of key comparisons in the Global
MRA. The consensus that was achieved at the 15th GA in APMP indicated
that closer contacts between each TC in APMP and related TCs in
other RMOs have been established in these few months.
Establishment of a higher-level traceability chain within the region
will be the first objective during the term of the new chairman
and secretary. Toward this end, the following three issues will
be raised:
- Clarification of the activities of each TC through correspondence
with other RMOs.
- Evaluation of Appendix C in each TC and EC, and its submission
to Joint Committee of the RMOs and the BIPM (JCRB).
- Planning of a seminar or workshop for the developing economies
in APEC and liaison with other regional organizations in APEC.
Finally, I would like to express again my sincere thanks to Dr.
Barry Inglis and Dr. Angela Samuel for their consideration in transferring
the secretariat. I hope to see an exchange of opinions and information
between member economies through our homepage and newsletters, which
will be published seasonally.
January, 2000

Hidetaka Imai, NRLM
|