Table 1 Timetable of the 16th APMP GA & Meetings
| 5 November 2000 |
Secretariat meeting
|
Central Grand Palace Hotel, Bangkok |
| 6 November 2000 |
TCs meeting & Workshop (Length, Electricity & Magnetism, Thermometry,
Acoustics/Ultrasound/Vibration, Photometry & Radiometry, Ionizing Radiation
|
| 7 November 2000 |
TCs meeting (Thermometry, Amount of Substance)
Workshop for NMIs from developing economies
11th EC/TC Chairs meeting
|
| 8 November 2000 |
Symposium for Global Assurance of Measurement Traceability Through Global
MRA
|
| 9 November 2000 |
16th APMP Global Assembly (Day 1)
|
Dusit-Polo Club, Cha-am |
| 10 November 2000 |
16th APMP Global Assembly (Day 1)
12th EC/TC Chairs meeting
|
|
General Assembly
As many as 80 people from 14 economies (24 institutions) out of 19 full
member economies and two associate members participated in the 16th APMP
GA. The members welcomed many guests, including those from CIPM (Dr. R.
Kaals, Dr. K. Iizuka), COOMET (4), EUROMET (3), MENAMET (1), SADCMET (1)
and SIM (1). It was the first time that the representatives from all five
other RMOs were present at the APMP GA. Numbers of APMP members and participants
in the GA have been increasing significantly, which means the NMIs of all
measurement fields in principal economies have become APMP members.
Discussion of Global MRA
Presently, two activities are attempting to build up the substance of MRA.
One is international comparisons, and its partial results have already
appeared in Appendix B of BIPM's website. The other activity is to publish
the list of the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMCs) that will
be submitted from the NMI of each economy. The CMCs need to be reviewed
by the RMOs including APMP before uploading to BIPM's database as Appendix
C. We can see some of the CMCs on BIPM's website (http://www.bipm.org/kedb/). There was much debate about CMC review processes and methods at the
GA and EC/TC Chair meetings.
The point at issue is whether:

Delegates got together in Thailand
A) Detailed review criteria similar to the accreditation are to be established

and the review conducted in accordancewith such criteria or, B) some flexibility
should be given based on mutual trust between NMIs.
There is a difference of views on the technical side in the same region,
and the issue is not so simple. In general, however, JCRB side and European
regions support B), while the technical side and APMP support A). The technical
side believes that the first priority should be given to setting the review
rules and evaluation criteria, and that each RMO should be responsible
for conducting the review under the identified and detailed rules. The
Length group has endorsed the idea of this course of action. However, the
JCRB takes exception to the point that the technically lower level of calibration
service will receive a lower priority under these rules. They believe that
the review should be conducted promptly based on mutual reliability between
NMIs, and processes such as using a testing laboratory are not recommended.
The technical side has asked the secretariat to unify the various opinions
of APMP members and issue the APMP recommendation in the near future.
Timing of CMC submissions was reconfirmed. Length and Electricity &
Magnetism should be listed on the JCRB database in January 2001, and Acoustics,
Ultrasound & Vibration and Standard Gas in June. The review schedule
for Thermometry has not been decided yet, and Thermometry was requested
to submit the CMC in time for the third round in May 2001.
Visiting Peer Review
The feasibility of mutual visiting peer reviews for evaluating calibration
capability was discussed. Japan conducted a peer review in Vietnam and
Thailand in October last year, and it was highly valued by the representatives
from both economies. Also, it was decided that the APMP would organize
a review team in collaboration with APLAC and submit a request to the APEC
for the budget in order to systematically promote the visiting peer review.
|

Representatives of RMOs. From left Dr. Wolfgang. Schwits (EUROMET), Dr.
Huseyin Ugur (MENAMET), Dr. Franz Hengstberger (SADCMET) and Dr. Hans-Dieter
Velfe (COOMET).
|
Executive Committee
The extension of Dr. Imai's (Japan) term of Chairman (one more term (two
years)) was approved unanimously at the GA. Also, the continuation (one
more year) of Dr. Inglis as Chair of the MAR Advisory Committee and of
Prof. Shi (presently Executive member) was approved. In addition, Mr. S.
Prayoon, Chair of DEC, joined the EC as a new member (two-year term).
Changes of three of nine TC Chairs [Length (Korea), Ionizing Radiation
(Korea) and Amount of Substances (Australia)] were proposed and approved.
New TC Chairs are introduced on the next page.
Membership Fee and Application for New Members
The membership fee has been discussed over two years, and the final proposal
from the secretariat including annual budget was approved. The DPR of Korea
is applying for full membership, and the Russian Federation hopes to be
an APMP associate member. It was approved to vote on these two applications.
Next GA and Other Meetings
The next APMP General Assembly will be held in November 2001 at Tsukuba,
Japan. A TCM workshop is also planned before GA. In addition, the international
comparison for the Iodine Stabilized He-Ne Laser was suggested. In 2002,
the APMP General Assembly will be held in Vietnam.
|